August 15, 2022

News and Update

Hundreds of thousands Face New Fluoridation Threats

The revealed science over the previous decade has taught us rather a lot about water fluoridation, about each the very actual and important negative effects inflicted on the general public, but additionally concerning the credibility of those that proceed to vouch for its security.

At this level, the query we should ask isn’t whether or not the overwhelming dangers outweigh the theoretical scant advantages, or whether or not extra analysis is required to attract sturdy conclusions. No, the one acceptable query now’s: How rather more hurt will the promoters and regulators of fluoridation permit the apply to inflict on the general public?

With out the Fluoride Motion Community, our coalition companions, and other people such as you taking a stand, their reply might be a powerful, “much more hurt!” With their credibility and affect at stake after defending fluoridation for greater than 75 years, they’ve sadly proven that they’ll not solely be the final to behave, however that they plan to double down till we cease them.

As we converse, tens of hundreds of thousands of residents presently residing on neighborhood water techniques with no added fluoride all through the US, Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand are dealing with the approaching risk of getting their water dosed with hazardous fluoridation chemical substances.

The CDC has introduced a brand new technique and helped develop a brand new know-how to fluoridate an addition 19+ million Individuals, which may also finally broaden to Canadians, Australians and sure others.

In the meantime, the governments within the U.Okay. and New Zealand have exploited the latest pandemic to go sweeping well being care reform payments that successfully embrace nationwide fluoridation mandates resulting from a long time of sturdy pushback from residents and elected officers on the native degree, holding fluoridation at bay.

Fluoride Has Already Broken the Enamel of Hundreds of thousands

The U.S. Facilities for Illness Management’s personal information taken from the Nationwide Well being and Vitamin Examination Surveys (NHANES) has repeatedly discovered that our youngsters in the US are considerably overexposed to fluoride, evidenced by skyrocketing charges of dental fluorosis.

Fluorosis is a biomarker of toxicity from ingested fluoride, and is a everlasting tooth defect, inflicting ugly discoloration and mottling of the enamel, weakening the enamel and leading to elevated dental decay.

Ingesting fluoridated water — significantly in reconstituted toddler method — and processed meals made with fluoridated water are acknowledged as the first sources of publicity, although swallowing toothpaste and fluoride prescriptions additionally contribute.

A 2015 evaluate of the apply of fluoridation by the Cochrane Collaboration, the gold normal for evidence-based critiques of well being interventions, discovered that “there’s a important affiliation between dental fluorosis (of aesthetic concern or all ranges of dental fluorosis) and [water] fluoride degree.”

The CDC reported that 41% of adolescents (12 to fifteen) had dental fluorosis in 2004. On the time this was a rise of over 400% from the charges discovered 60 years prior. Then the 2012 survey discovered that the speed jumped considerably to 65+% of adolescents with dental fluorosis.

Now, in response to a latest examine (Yang, June 2021) revealed within the journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Security utilizing the information from the NHANES 2015-16 survey, the “prevalence of dental fluorosis was 70% within the U.S. youngsters.”

Which means that the enamel of hundreds of thousands of kids, teenagers and adults have already been broken by overexposure to fluoride throughout growth, and the CDC, together with the opposite promoters of fluoridation are totally conscious. Nevertheless, the enamel are usually not the one tissues within the physique which might be harmed by or accumulate fluoride. There is no such thing as a obvious cause, subsequently, why fluoride’s results on the physique could be restricted to the enamel. As famous by famend dentist and researcher Dr. Hardy Limeback:

… it’s illogical to imagine that tooth enamel is the one tissue affected by low day by day doses of fluoride ingestion.

NHANES information has been utilized in latest revealed and peer-reviewed research to hyperlink fluoridated water with various extra side-effects, together with earlier onset of menstruation for black teenagers, sleep issues in adolescents, improve uric acid ranges within the blood, and kidney and liver impairment in adolescents.

Further research on fluoridation have additionally just lately discovered increased charges of hip fractures, disruption of the endocrine system, and elevated charges of hypothyroidism.

Fluoride Is the New Lead

There may be now a big physique of government-funded analysis indicating that fluoride is neurotoxic, and is related to lowered IQ in youngsters and a major improve in ADHD analysis and associated behaviors in youngsters at doses skilled in fluoridated communities. Consultants within the toxicology have likened the scale of the impact to that from lead.

So far, 69 human research, most from endemic fluorosis areas in China, have related lowered IQ with fluoride publicity. The very best high quality fluoride mind research have been revealed since 2017, when the primary of 5 NIEHS-NIH (Nationwide Institutes of Well being) funded prospective-cohort research was revealed (Bashash et al., 2017) discovering an affiliation between fetal publicity to fluoride and lowered IQ in Mexico.

A yr later, one other NIH-funded examine discovered a rise in ADHD signs related to in utero publicity to fluoride (Bashash et al., 2018).

Over the following two years, two extra of those government-funded research discovered related outcomes, linking fetal publicity to fluoridated water in Canada to lowered IQ (Inexperienced et al., 2019), and discovering that bottle-fed infants in fluoridated communities in Canada had a considerably lowered IQ in comparison with bottle-fed infants in non-fluoridated communities (Until et al., 2020).

See also  Fermented Meals Could Be a Key Element of an Anticancer Menu

And simply final yr, the fifth NIH-funded examine (Cantoral et al, 2021), discovered that for each 0.5 mg improve in dietary fluoride consumption throughout being pregnant was related to a 3.10 to three.46-point decrease cognitive rating in boys. The authors acknowledged:

“Fluoride isn’t a necessary nutrient and … fluoride ingestion in being pregnant doesn’t strengthen enamel throughout tooth formation within the fetus however has been related to elevated danger of neurotoxicity, even at optimum publicity ranges …

These findings recommend that the event of nonverbal talents in males could also be extra susceptible to prenatal fluoride publicity than language or motor talents, even at ranges inside the beneficial consumption vary.”

I strongly urge you to observe and share this latest 20-minute PowerPoint presentation by professor Christine Until, Ph.D., lead writer of a few of these landmark fluoride research, explaining her crew’s analysis and findings.

In 2021, the primary benchmark dose evaluation performed on maternal fluoride publicity and neurotoxicity to the fetus was revealed within the journal Threat Evaluation (Grandjean, 2021). Benchmark doses analyses are utilized by the EPA and toxicologist to find out at what degree a substance begins to trigger hurt. It’s properly established {that a} lack of one IQ level results in a decreased lifetime incomes capacity of $18,000.

The evaluation confirmed that extraordinarily low fluoride publicity throughout being pregnant impairs fetal mind growth, discovering {that a} maternal urine fluoride focus of solely 0.2mg/L — which coincides with the extent in water (0.2ppm) — was sufficient to decrease IQ by not less than 1 level.

That is 4 occasions decrease than the present authorities “beneficial” degree of 0.8ppm in fluoridated communities. It’s additionally six occasions decrease than the extent that was beneficial as “secure” by the CDC, HHS, and the American Dental Affiliation for over 60-years up till 2011 (1.2ppm).

For perspective, A urinary fluoride (UF) focus of 0.2mg/L is much under what a pregnant girl in a fluoridated neighborhood would have, as confirmed by two latest research. A latest examine of pregnant girls in fluoridated San Francisco, California, discovered a imply UF focus of 0.74mg/L. A second examine with members in fluoridated communities throughout Canada discovered a imply UF focus of 1.06mg/L.

Each research additionally discovered that the UF ranges had been considerably decrease for the members residing within the non-fluoridated communities. The authors of the benchmark dose evaluation acknowledged:

“These findings recommend that fetal mind growth is extremely susceptible to fluoride publicity … and supply extra proof that fluoride is a developmental neurotoxicant (i.e., inflicting hostile results on mind growth in formative years).

Given the ubiquity of fluoride publicity, the inhabitants impression of hostile results from fluoride could also be even better than for different poisonous components like lead, mercury, and arsenic … and the benchmark outcomes ought to encourage a revision of water fluoride suggestions aimed toward defending pregnant girls and younger youngsters.”

These authors are hardly alone in evaluating fluoride’s neurotoxic impression to the well-established hurt of lead:

  • Dr. Dimitri Christakis, MPH, and Dr. Frederick Rivara, MPH, editors for the Journal of the American Medical Affiliation (JAMA) on their podcast (round 4:25): “[The 4.5 IQ loss is] An impact dimension which is sizeable — on par with lead.”
  • Christine Until, PhD, co-author of a number of landmark fluoride/neurotoxicity research, on Canada’s CTV: “4.5 factors is a dramatic lack of IQ, akin to what you’d see with lead publicity.”
  • David Bellinger, Ph.D., MSc, Harvard professor of neurology, on NPR: “It’s really similar to the impact dimension that’s seen with childhood publicity to steer.”

Different consultants, together with Linda Birnbaum PhD, former Director of the Nationwide Toxicology Program, stress the necessity to keep away from fluoride:

“Given the burden of proof that fluoride is poisonous to the growing mind, it’s time [to] shield pregnant girls and their youngsters [and recommend they] scale back their fluoride consumption.”

There at the moment are 9 fluoride mother-offspring research linking fluoride publicity to hurt, and 23 research revealed on the affiliation between fluoride publicity and decreased IQ since 2017.

How FAN Responded to the Science

Due to the rising listing of revealed fluoride-IQ research, and the downplaying of their significance by pro-fluoridation advocates such because the Division of Oral Well being on the CDC and the American Dental Affiliation, FAN launched into two initiatives in 2016.

First, we requested the Nationwide Toxicology Program undertake a scientific evaluate of ALL the research (animal, human and mobile) pertaining to fluoride’s potential to break the mind. The NTP agreed with our request, they usually plan to publish the ultimate outcomes of their multiyear evaluate of fluoride neurotoxicity any day now. Within the two first drafts the NTP concluded, “that fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive neurodevelopmental hazard to people …”

The evaluate drafts recognized over 100 research exhibiting hostile results together with IQ loss and elevated ADHD. Amongst 27 research designated as top quality, 15 present fluoride harm on the similar publicity ranges present in neighborhood fluoridation applications.

Second, we petitioned the EPA below provisions within the Poisonous Substances and Management Act to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridation chemical substances to the ingesting water provide as a result of it poses an unreasonable danger to the growing brains of kids. The EPA’s lack of motion led to FAN suing them in federal courtroom.

The preliminary section of the trial was held in June 2020, concluding with the decide saying, “I don’t suppose anybody disputes that fluoride is a hazard.” Nevertheless, the courtroom is awaiting the ultimate NTP report earlier than transferring ahead with the ultimate section of the trial. Here’s a quick video replace on the lawsuit from FAN’s legal professional.

See also  9 methods to remain wholesome whereas working remotely

This previous yr, FAN launched into a two extra initiatives. We communicated with the U.S. surgeon normal concerning the danger posed by fluoridation to growing youngsters, and requested that he take motion to warn mother and father.

We additionally initiated a dialogue with CDC officers (see preliminary letter signed by 112 professionals) that finally led to them organizing shows for his or her management from a number of fluoride/neurotoxicity examine authors, Dr. Bruce Lanphear, Christine Until, Ph.D., and Dr. Philippe Grandjean on their analysis.

How Promoters Have Responded to the Science: A New Risk

It has been six months because the CDC heard the shows on neurotoxicity from the three veteran researchers, and it’s been over a decade because the CDC acknowledged that fluoridation has broken the enamel of hundreds of thousands.

But, the CDC, together with the EPA, World Well being Group, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Dental Affiliation and their state degree friends not solely have did not warn residents concerning the risks posed by fluoridation, however have continued advocating for fluoridation enlargement despite the science.

The CDC has partnered with the chemical business to focus on 19 million residents in 32,000 small and medium sized communities throughout the US that don’t add fluoridation chemical substances to the general public ingesting water. Utilizing your tax {dollars}, the CDC supplied upward of $2 million {dollars} in funds to personal enterprise to develop a fluoridation supply product for water techniques serving between 50 and 10,000 folks.

The widespread sale and promotion of this new product started in January all through the U.S., however can also be deliberate for Canada and Australia within the close to future. The American Dental Affiliation has joined the CDC in pushing this new technique.

In July of 2021, the CDC held a “Public Well being Grand Rounds” presentation on fluoridation. Whereas there was no point out of the big variety of new research linking low ranges of fluoridated water to neurotoxicity, it was an infomercial for a brand new know-how that the CDC and ADA had been calling “a sport changer” of their efforts to broaden fluoridation.

Under is a slide from that presentation, the place you may see they intend to extend the proportion of fluoridated water techniques from 73% to 77% — representing 19 million folks on 32,000 water techniques — by 2030.

cdc press release march 2021

This objective isn’t precisely new. The CDC and ADA have utilized various methods over the previous decade to broaden the apply, however largely resulting from FAN and our community of native volunteers and professionals, the variety of fluoridating communities has really decreased, whereas the inhabitants served has elevated barely resulting from city progress.

To perform this important improve over the following eight years, they intend to make the most of a brand new fluoridation system particularly designed to be easy and low-cost sufficient for even the smallest water techniques, which might embrace non-public techniques, and even faculties and public colleges.

They’re calling it the “New Wave Fluoridation System.” It makes use of compacted sodium fluorosilicate in a pill kind designed to dissolve over time in a small quantity of water, very like the deodorizer tablets utilized in urinals.

supporting rural health

Now we have discovered that this course of began in 2013, when CDC’s chief fluoridation engineer, Kip Duchon, prompt that the CDC assist develop a product that was possible for small and rural communities. Quickly thereafter the CDC introduced a Small Enterprise Innovation Analysis grant alternative — offering upward of $2 million — for personal enterprise to develop and take a look at the thought.

KC Industries, of Mulberry, Florida, was awarded not less than two massive grants, one to develop the pill and the opposite to develop the injection/feeder system.

KC Industries is a small chemical producer with a handful of workers. Based on their web site, “The plant was constructed by Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Company and commenced producing Sodium Fluorosilicate in 1957 as a uncooked materials to fabricate aluminum.”

KC Industries bought the power in 1999 and seems to have centered closely on the “dry” fluoride ingesting water additive market with sodium fluoride. Right here is their web page on their sodium fluoride product; it’s value a fast look.

Over the previous 20 years, extra communities have switched their additive to fluorosilicic acid, which is an extremely harmful and corrosive liquid, however is cheaper. This led to an enormous decline in gross sales of dry components, and KC Industries’ income.

Based on their press launch, they had been struggling till the CDC’s grant, which they are saying supplied “a brand new lease on life” for the chemical firm. They’re anticipating “a right away return on funding” as communities clamor for the brand new system.

KC Trade representatives have stated that curiosity within the system has come from world wide. The primary neighborhood to make use of the product as a part of a free pilot mission is Cleveland, Georgia. Different communities which have signed on embrace Marathon, Wisconsin; Middle, Colorado; and Aulander, North Carolina. The Missouri state legislature has additionally included practically $4 million in funding over the following few years to go towards grants to broaden this system of their state.

The CDC worker who initiated this course of, Kip Duchon, has retired from the CDC and is now a guide to the ADA’s Nationwide Fluoridation Advisory Committee.

The ADA has already known as it a “game-changer” and lobbied Congressional members to incorporate taxpayer funding for this know-how within the latest infrastructure invoice supposed to assist economic system out of the pandemic.

In the meantime, the CDC additionally continues to present very massive taxpayer-funded grants to states to pay for public relations campaigns to advertise fluoridation.

See also  The Science Behind Time-Restricted Consuming

Pandemic Exploited to Mandate Fluoridation in UK, New Zealand

Even worse than what is going on in North America with the brand new pill fluoridation system, is the latest passage of laws in each the UK and New Zealand, transferring authority over fluoridation from native officers (and not directly the general public) to unelected public well being bureaucrats who’ve vowed to mandate the apply all through their respective nations with out concern for what the general public desires.

Each nations embrace fluoridation resolutions as a part of a much wider legislative effort to centralize public well being selections in response to the pandemic. The U.Okay. and New Zealand will now be part of Eire and Singapore because the 4 public well being outliers in a world that has overwhelmingly rejected fluoridated water.

Final yr, the New Zealand authorities revived, amended and handed a invoice that was launched in 2016, however lacked sufficient help for passage. As launched, the invoice would have moved fluoridation selections from native councils — the place they reside presently — to district well being boards.

Nevertheless, the present authorities amended the language to centralize fluoridation authority even additional, by giving full management to the director-general of well being, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield. Utilizing this course of defied the conventional democratic course of, with no choose committee, neighborhood session or public enter. Native councils (and native taxpayers) might be answerable for all capital and operational prices.

Just like the CDC, authorities officers and public well being officers had been warned upfront of the hurt their choice would trigger, but they ignored it.

Some native leaders have shortly made their opposition to this proposal heard, together with the mayor of Whangarei, Sheryl Mai, who stated, “Individuals who drink water from the faucet might be mass medicated whether or not they wish to be or not.”

Mayor Greg Lang of Carterton, and Mayor Alex Beijen of South Wairarapa, each opposed the measure as a result of it took councils, customers and ratepayers out of the choice. Officers in Christchurch and Southland have additionally just lately voiced opposition, saying security is a better precedence than fluoride. Clearly, there may be nonetheless an opportunity for these communities that push again in opposition to this proposal.

Within the U.Okay., a long time of efforts by the federal government to broaden fluoridation stalled having reached solely 10% of the inhabitants. Efforts to fluoridate Northern Eire failed miserably with 22 councils voting in opposition to the measure. Scotland too remained unfluoridated. Efforts over the past 20 years to fluoridate Southampton, Manchester, and Hull additionally failed.

Because of this, Prime Minister Boris Johnson proposed an addition to the big Well being and Care Act that will successfully mandate fluoridation by giving the well being secretary, Sajid Javid, unilateral energy to pressure communities all through the nation so as to add fluoridation chemical substances to the general public water provides.

FAN coordinated with locals to mount opposition to this proposal, together with a sequence of public letters from British scientists accusing public well being officers of ignoring the science. The opposition culminated on the ground of the Home of Lords, the place various members spoke out in opposition to the proposal, together with Lord Reay, who warned of the hazards posed to growing youngsters.

Since passage into regulation, FAN has made an official submission to the federal government urging the Division of Well being and Social Care to carry out a well being danger evaluation on the consequences of fluoridated water on the pregnant girl, the fetus and the formula-fed toddler, earlier than implementing fluoridation into the U.Okay. No regulatory company in any fluoridating nation has ever achieved this.

Nevertheless, because the U.Okay. is considering increasing fluoridation to the entire nation, it’s important that that is achieved earlier than they embark on this program.

The Final Line of Protection

I wish to conclude by asking the identical query I requested at first of this text, however rephrased: How rather more hurt will YOU permit the promoters and regulators of fluoridation to inflict on the general public?

As I write this, hundreds of thousands of growing infants and infants are being overexposed to fluoride from their fluoridated faucet water. The analysis has proven that there’s no secure quantity of fluoride for the fetus or toddler. All might be impacted, some considerably greater than others.

Please assist us defend these susceptible youngsters and provides them the present of regular mind growth. Assist us additionally shield different susceptible subpopulations, together with these with hypersensitivities, dental fluorosis, bone brittleness and kidney, liver, or thyroid impairment.

The Fluoride Motion Community is a nonprofit advocacy group arrange in 2000 to broaden consciousness amongst residents, scientists and policymakers on the toxicity of fluoride compounds. It maintains the biggest on-line database for fluoride toxicity research, and has helped most of the 300+ communities which have ended or rejected fluoridation chemical substances since 2010.

We’re amplifying the voices of a rising refrain of famend worldwide consultants in toxicology, neurology and environmental toxins, warning the general public about fluoridation, and educating and recruiting extra to talk out.

We’ve captured the surgeon normal’s and the CDCs’ consideration, made progress with our federal lawsuit in opposition to the EPA, helped communities come collectively to struggle fluoridation, and labored with state legislators to defeat mandate payments and help prohibition efforts.

Are you able to assist us proceed defend our water and our well being, and broaden our efforts as new threats come up right here in North America and world wide in the UK and New Zealand? Will you stand with FAN?

Supply hyperlink